Saturday, February 28, 2015

PARKING TICKET

My wife and I went into town and visited a shop. When we came out,  there was a cop writing out a parking ticket.  

We went up to him and I said, "come on man, how about giving a senior citizen a break?" 
He ignored us and continued writing the  ticket. I called him an "a**hole."  
He glared at me and started writing another ticket for having worn-out tires. 

So Kitty (my wife) called him a "s*ithead." He finished the second  ticket and put it on the windshield with the first. 
Then he started writing more tickets.  This went on for about 20 minutes. 
The more we abused him, the more  tickets he wrote. He finally finished, sneered at us and walked away.  

Just then our bus arrived, and we got on it and went home.  We always look for cars with Obama 2012 stickers. 
We try to have a little fun each day now that we're retired. Its so important at our age!!

10 comments:

Jonathan Carty said...

Lmao that's messed up for the owner

Anonymous said...

Seriously?
Republicans think its okay to cause financial harm to people they dont know?

Is that what they claim the Democrats are doing?

Seriously?
And this was funny?

To who is this funny, a Democrat or a Republican, and why?

Anonymous said...

Made me laugh!

Anonymous said...

You better believe that is exactly what demorats do. This was funny. Besides, the republicans did not cause any financial hardship, they just brought to light all the laws the demorats were breaking. If there are penalties for breaking the laws, so be it.

Anonymous said...

We have to laugh at our mistakes. Putting Mr. UN-Constitutional Obozo in office once was a mistake. Twice was just plain stupid.

Anonymous said...

THERE HAS NEVER BEEN AN ELECTION AS LONG AS I HAVE BEEN ALIVE THAT HAS COUNTED FAIRLY.....THEY ARE ALL RIGGED TO GET THEIR GUYS IN PLACE.....FACT...SOROS OWNS BOTH THE DOMO-RAT AND THE REPLI-CONJOB PARTIES..... HE EVEN OWNS THE ELECTION COUNTING MACHINES HE SET UP IN SPAIN.....CHECK IT OUT....O-SCUMBAG IS SO STUPID HE CANNOT SPEAK WITHOUT A TELEPROMPTER..... WE NEED TO HIRE THE ICELANDERS TO EITHER GET RID OF THE THE BASTARDS FOR US, OR TEACH US HOW TO DO IT......I AM ASHAMED OF HOW LAZY AND STUPID OUR COUNTRY HAS BECOME!!!!

Anonymous said...

This is AnonymousFebruary 28, 2015 at 6:46 PM

According to the three responses it appears it is funny to cause someone financial harm without knowing them.

If one is Republican, then causing financial harm is approved as long as a Republican does it to a Democrat.

And we want to be free, and shoot who for what?

In my opinion,
" not worth " the space on the webpage where it is posted.

Getting out of one form oppression and financial harm doesn't matter if the same people we are getting out with are still capable of the same form of oppression.and financial harm.

Freewill said...

Of course if people had the brains to keep us out of that mess in the first place... Those tickets are under motor vehicle code! Motor vehicle code only applies to motorized automobiles that are moving goods or people for profit!

Marbury V. Madison 5 U.S. 137 says the Constitution of the United States is the Supreme law of the land.
Shapiro V. Thompson 394 U.S. 618 says the right to travel is so basic that it shouldn’t even be questioned.
Murdoch V. Pennsylvania 319 U.S. 106 says no state may convert a secure liberty into a privilege and then issue a license and a fee for it.
Shuttlesworth V. Birmingham Alabama 373 U.S. 262 says I can ignore the license and engage in the right with impunity, that means you can’t punish me for it.
Norton V. Shelby County 118 U.S. 425 an unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights and poses no duties, affords no protections, and creates no office. It is in legal contemplation as inoperative though it had never been passed.
US V. Bishop 412 U.S. 346 Defines willfulness as an evil motive or intent to avoid a known duty or task under law with immoral certainty. I am using the constitution and supreme court cases so I am not using evil motives or intents.
16th Andrews prudent second section 97 says that it shall be interpreted in my favor because I am the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary for the protection of my rights and property.

CRUDEN v. NEALE 2N.C. (1796) 2 SE 70 "Every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent"

Whatever said...

If all of you still think that there is any difference between the two(or any) corporately bought and paid for political parties, then this little joke obviously hit its mark(s). They've been running this little 'us vs them ' and 'you really do have choices' scam on all of us since the beginning of forever. Until ALL of them start actually working for ALL of us (as they portray themselves as doing), then be assured that corporate money and perks are still running the WHOLE show behind the scenes. Sad but factual.

Anonymous said...

Washington state, yep, the one above Oregon, in their transportation code there are exempt persons.

Since the code is for transportation the blurp to explain the exemption is just that, a blurp.

I says one is exempt if they are not operating in commerce (where operating is surely a commercial term meaning you are engaged in commerce), and only have incidental use of the highway (which is considered minimal travel when you look at jobs that require a driver's license and jobs that do not)

Exempt vehicles in the transportation code are vehicles used incidentally on the highway like dump trucks and tow trucks, exempt vehicles do not have to be registered, and to register you'd HAVE TO HAVE a driver's license to get the license plates to register the vehicle.

See how all of that is intertwined?

You can't read a code that says you have no right and find you have rights all through the code, you have to look for the parts that mention what puts you outside of the code, they aren't going to spend a lot of time telling you how you are outside the code when the purpose of the code is to tell those in the code what they can and cannot do.

If people read the code, they would not be sitting on juries acting like they are peers to the people they judge are are using a right they have.

Notice all these cases had to go to a court that knew the code because the lower courts are people who think it's the law and they should be punished.

Our ignorance wants to make us buy guns to protect our ignorance from people who know more about the law, whether they abide by it or not, they know more about it than most.

One other thing, if we can get more non us citizens to come into this country we can get our republic back.
it was the people who rejected the king's rule that formed the republic and the people who were still under his rule that took it back.

So all these people still in the system not helping but complaining about the tipping of the scales for those who are not citizens, don't think the forming of the Republic has anything to do with you, and it would be treason for a general to fight his own country from within.

You people who think you can fight a system you are a member of, are on a list for a reason.
You joined the club and then want to form a group to fight it from within?

You don't like the club, you start saying no. The Secretary of State will give you a certificate if you apply that says you are out of the club.

How many of you have guns and are still in the club.

We would not want you in a Republic either. You get mad, and you'll want to shoot within the Republic to get what you want.

Yep, the list is for you because you are double minded and don't know what you want, and want other people to do what you want, when you haven't made up your mind where you belong.

Keep thinking causing harm to another, even financial harm is funny.
The list is for you.

The rest of us don't want what you are selling.