Tuesday, January 17, 2017

Organization Offers $2.5k to Protest Trump Inauguration

Report: ‘Grassroots’ Organization Offers $2.5k to Protest Trump Inauguration


Online job postings claim to provide travel expenses, insurance benefits to 'operatives'

Thousands of Criminal Illegal Immigrants Sent Home

Thousands of Criminal Illegal Immigrants Sent Home After Apprehension at Southwest Border


Audit faults Border Patrol for lax oversight of consequences for criminal illegal immigrants


Morgan Chalfant

January 17 2017


Nearly 4,000 illegal immigrants apprehended by U.S. Border Patrol at the southwest border over a three-year period were allowed to return to their home countries despite having past criminal convictions and connections to criminal networks.

The statistic is included in a new government audit exposing shortcomings in the way Border Patrol agents deal with illegal immigrants caught trying to cross the border into the United States.

Border Patrol agents use the Consequence Delivery System, or CDS, to classify apprehended aliens using seven criminal and noncriminal categories. They then decide which of eight consequences the apprehended aliens should receive, based on how effective the consequences are in preventing the individuals from trying again to illegally enter the United States. The CDS system plays a major role in the Department of Homeland Security’s efforts to combat transnational criminal organizations and drug smuggling across the U.S. border.

However, Border Patrol agents incorrectly classified roughly 15,000 criminal alien apprehensions between fiscal years 2013-15, according to a Government Accountability Office report issued this month. Twenty-four percent of these aliens, or 3,717, were allowed to voluntarily return to their countries of origin. Voluntary return is rated as the least effective and efficient of the consequences. More severe consequences include criminal prosecution.

“Our analysis showed that criminal aliens not classified in accordance with agency guidance were less likely to face prosecution and more likely to be voluntarily returned to their home country than criminal aliens overall,” the GAO investigation concluded.

Border Patrol agents were less likely in 2015 to choose the most effective and efficient consequences in cases of apprehended aliens. Agents’ use of these consequences declined from 28 percent in fiscal 2013 to 18 percent in 2015; data from fiscal 2016 was not available to auditors.

“Border Patrol has not assessed reasons for the relatively low application of consequences determined to be the Most Effective and Efficient consequence in each sector; but some agency officials stated that challenges include agents’ hesitation to apply consequences that require referral to federal partners facing capacity constraints, such as Department of Justice immigration courts,” the GAO wrote.

Auditors found that Border Patrol significantly underestimated the recidivism rate for apprehended aliens, which the department uses to measure the performance of the CDS process. According to GAO’s analysis, 29 percent of past offenders were apprehended again in fiscal 2015, compared with the 14 percent recidivism rate reported by Border Patrol for the same time period.

Auditors recommended that Border Patrol more accurately measure recidivism, collect testimony on why agents don’t apply consequences rated most effective and efficient, and boost oversight of the CDS process.

Rep. Michael McCaul (R., Texas), who chairs the House Committee on Homeland Security, told the Washington Free Beacon that he plans to follow up with the department on its implementation of GAO’s recommendations.

“The CBP needs to better measure the effectiveness of the consequences it provides to aliens who cross the border illegally to prevent recidivism,” McCaul said on Monday. “This report provides several recommendations to that end, and I will be following up with CBP to ensure it implements those recommendations.”

The audit was issued days after retired Marine Gen. John Kelly, President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to oversee immigration and the border as secretary of homeland security, appeared before the Senate for his confirmation hearing.

Kelly, a former commander of the U.S. Southern Command, underscored the need to staunch the flow of drugs and people across the southern border with a “layered defense” that includes human patrols, sensors, and cooperation with neighboring countries like Mexico. Kelly said that a “physical barrier” like a border wall, the cornerstone of Trump’s campaign rhetoric on immigration, would not be enough on its own to secure the border.

Border Patrol agents caught more than 1.1 million aliens along the southwest border over the three-year period covered by the audit. They apprehended roughly 300,000 in fiscal 2015 alone.



"CHOICE" || Spoken Word Poetry

Published on Jan 9, 2017
Abortion destroys precious individuals who are made in the image of God. “Choice,” a riveting Spoken Word poetry video by Living Waters President, Emeal (“E.Z.”) Zwayne, drives this urgent truth home, and holds up the glorious gospel as our only hope and remedy.  Please watch it, and share it, for the sake of lives and souls. Watch our related movie, “180,” freely online (over 5 million views): http://www.180movie.com
Emeal (“E.Z.”) Zwayne Bio: http://www.180movie.com/choice
SUBSCRIBE to get the latest: http://www.livingwaters.com/weekly-ne...
You have our joyous permission to show this in your church or event. (You can download an HD version of this video at: http://store.livingwaters.com/choice-...)

BREAKING: Clinton Foundation Layoffs!

BREAKING: Clinton Collapse! Foundation Laying Off Numerous Staffers

It appears that, at long last, the Clinton Foundation is discovering that trading influence for money doesn’t work out so well when you don’t have any influence to trade.
 Clinton Collapse
Foundation Preps for Massive Layoffs!



It appears that, at long last, the Clinton Foundation is discovering that trading influence for money doesn’t work out so well when you don’t have any influence to trade.

According to The Daily Caller, 22 staffers are being laid off at the Clinton Global Initiative, one of the multifarious tentacles of the Clinton Foundation. The layoffs will be effective as of April 15, a filing from the group said.
Politico reported on the announcement of layoffs back in September, before the election.

The layoffs come as an investigation by the FBI into the Clinton Foundation is in full swing. Many allege that the foundation was used as little more than a slush fund for the Clinton family, all the while peddling influence during Hillary Clinton’s time at the State Department.

The foundation has also been suffering with cash flow problems since Hillary Clinton’s swan dive at the polls back in November. Apparently, there aren’t too many satrapies willing to pay either Clinton for access when there’s not much access to be bought. Who would have thunk it?

The Clinton Global Initiative was one of the more nebulous arms of the Clinton Foundation. According to its website, CGI “convenes global leaders to create and implement innovative solutions to the world’s most pressing challenges.” In other words, it manages conferences. At its height, the Clinton Global Initiative employed about 200 people.

There’s nothing quite as satisfying as seeing heads roll at the Clinton Foundation, even if it’s a bit late in the day for it. We can only hope that the Clinton family’s sick slush fund is dismantled and that the former first family is no longer able to peddle their influence. In the absence of that, however, 22 people being laid off is certainly a good start. We can only hope there’s more to come.

H/T Breitbart


Monday, January 16, 2017

Moody's Caught Robbing the People Blind, Gets Fined and Allowed to Stay ...

James O’Keefe of Project Veritas has blown the lid off Anti-Trumpers planning to use criminal acts to stop the Presidential Inauguration.

We’ve heard about possible acts by liberal snowflakes to disrupt the Presidential inauguration in bits and pieces on social media, nothing of source, but this video does it and brings everything to light. These men, if they are not arrested, should be immediately and anyone connected with them over the past few months.

There’s a reason why Project Veritas continues to be at the forefront of journalism, and that is because they are willing to put it all on the line to get to the truth. They are not just tweeting conspiracies and trying to increase their social media following. They are in this to expose and fix, and that’s admirable.

If you are unable to watch this on your mobile device, please click here:


Some Election Interference is More Equal Than Others – How Ukraine Meddled on Behalf of Clinton

Source: Michael Krieger, Liberty Blitzkrieg

A couple of days ago, Politico published a fascinating piece describing how factions associated with the current Ukrainian government apparently interfered in the U.S. election on behalf of Hillary Clinton. The findings seem pretty damning, and certainly warrant at least some conversation within the American media given the 24/7 obsession with Russia. Nevertheless, most of you have probably never heard of this saga, since when it comes to the corporate media news cycle, some election interference is more equal than others.

The article is lengthy, and can be confusing at times given all the moving parts, but I highly encourage you to read it. Ukrainian interference in the election can be traced to essentially two sources. First, there was the apparent collaboration between the Ukrainian embassy in Washington D.C. and a highly paid Ukrainian-American DNC consultant, Alexandra Chalupa. The second angle is far more disturbing, and involves the publicization of a so-called ledger demonstrating corruption between Paul Manafort and pro-Russian elements in Ukraine, by a parliamentarian named Serhiy Leshchenko. Bizarrely, the investigation was effectively dropped after Trump won the election, making you wonder if there was anything really there in the first place.
What follows are excerpts from the excellent piece, Ukrainian Efforts to Sabotage Trump Backfire:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found. 

A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation. 

The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine’s foe to the east, Russia. But they were far less concerted or centrally directed than Russia’s alleged hacking and dissemination of Democratic emails.

Politico’s investigation found evidence of Ukrainian government involvement in the race that appears to strain diplomatic protocol dictating that governments refrain from engaging in one another’s elections.

The Ukrainian antipathy for Trump’s team — and alignment with Clinton’s — can be traced back to late 2013. That’s when the country’s president, Viktor Yanukovych, whom Manafort had been advising, abruptly backed out of a European Union pact linked to anti-corruption reforms. Instead, Yanukovych entered into a multibillion-dollar bailout agreement with Russia, sparking protests across Ukraine and prompting Yanukovych to flee the country to Russia under Putin’s protection. 

In the ensuing crisis, Russian troops moved into the Ukrainian territory of Crimea, and Manafort dropped off the radar. 

Manafort’s work for Yanukovych caught the attention of a veteran Democratic operative named Alexandra Chalupa, who had worked in the White House Office of Public Liaison during the Clinton administration. Chalupa went on to work as a staffer, then as a consultant, for Democratic National Committee. The DNC paid her $412,000 from 2004 to June 2016, according to Federal Election Commission records, though she also was paid by other clients during that time, including Democratic campaigns and the DNC’s arm for engaging expatriate Democrats around the world.
She said she shared her concern with Ukraine’s ambassador to the U.S., Valeriy Chaly, and one of his top aides, Oksana Shulyar, during a March 2016 meeting at the Ukrainian Embassy. According to someone briefed on the meeting, Chaly said that Manafort was very much on his radar, but that he wasn’t particularly concerned about the operative’s ties to Trump since he didn’t believe Trump stood much of a chance of winning the GOP nomination, let alone the presidency.

Chalupa said the embassy also worked directly with reporters researching Trump, Manafort and Russia to point them in the right directions. She added, though, “they were being very protective and not speaking to the press as much as they should have. I think they were being careful because their situation was that they had to be very, very careful because they could not pick sides. It’s a political issue, and they didn’t want to get involved politically because they couldn’t.” 

Shulyar vehemently denied working with reporters or with Chalupa on anything related to Trump or Manafort, explaining “we were stormed by many reporters to comment on this subject, but our clear and adamant position was not to give any comment [and] not to interfere into the campaign affairs.”

Shulyar said her work with Chalupa “didn’t involve the campaign,” and she specifically stressed that “We have never worked to research and disseminate damaging information about Donald Trump and Paul Manafort.” 

But Andrii Telizhenko, who worked as a political officer in the Ukrainian Embassy under Shulyar, said she instructed him to help Chalupa research connections between Trump, Manafort and Russia. “Oksana said that if I had any information, or knew other people who did, then I should contact Chalupa,” recalled Telizhenko, who is now a political consultant in Kiev. “They were coordinating an investigation with the Hillary team on Paul Manafort with Alexandra Chalupa,” he said, adding “Oksana was keeping it all quiet,” but “the embassy worked very closely with” Chalupa. 
In fact, sources familiar with the effort say that Shulyar specifically called Telizhenko into a meeting with Chalupa to provide an update on an American media outlet’s ongoing investigation into Manafort. 

Telizhenko recalled that Chalupa told him and Shulyar that, “If we can get enough information on Paul [Manafort] or Trump’s involvement with Russia, she can get a hearing in Congress by September.”
Sure seems like pretty close coordination between a DNC consultant and the official embassy of Ukraine in the midst of a Presidential election.
Nevertheless, that’s small potatoes compared to what happened within the Ukrainian parliament itself. As Politico notes:
While it’s not uncommon for outside operatives to serve as intermediaries between governments and reporters, one of the more damaging Russia-related stories for the Trump campaign — and certainly for Manafort — can be traced more directly to the Ukrainian government. 

Documents released by an independent Ukrainian government agency — and publicized by a parliamentarian — appeared to show $12.7 million in cash payments that were earmarked for Manafort by the Russia-aligned party of the deposed former president, Yanukovych. 

The New York Times, in the August story revealing the ledgers’ existence, reported that the payments earmarked for Manafort were “a focus” of an investigation by Ukrainian anti-corruption officials, while CNN reported days later that the FBI was pursuing an overlapping inquiry.

Clinton’s campaign seized on the story to advance Democrats’ argument that Trump’s campaign was closely linked to Russia. The ledger represented “more troubling connections between Donald Trump’s team and pro-Kremlin elements in Ukraine,” Robby Mook, Clinton’s campaign manager, said in a statement. He demanded that Trump “disclose campaign chair Paul Manafort’s and all other campaign employees’ and advisers’ ties to Russian or pro-Kremlin entities, including whether any of Trump’s employees or advisers are currently representing and or being paid by them.” 

A former Ukrainian investigative journalist and current parliamentarian named Serhiy Leshchenko, who was elected in 2014 as part of Poroshenko’s party, held a news conference to highlight the ledgers, and to urge Ukrainian and American law enforcement to aggressively investigate Manafort. 

“I believe and understand the basis of these payments are totally against the law — we have the proof from these books,” Leshchenko said during the news conference, which attracted international media coverage. “If Mr. Manafort denies any allegations, I think he has to be interrogated into this case and prove his position that he was not involved in any misconduct on the territory of Ukraine,” Leshchenko added. 
These are some really serious allegations, which makes his current behavior, which I’ll highlight later, that much more concerning.
Manafort denied receiving any off-books cash from Yanukovych’s Party of Regions, and said that he had never been contacted about the ledger by Ukrainian or American investigators, later telling POLITICO “I was just caught in the crossfire.”
The scrutiny around the ledgers — combined with that from other stories about his Ukraine work — proved too much, and he stepped down from the Trump campaign less than a week after the Times story.

At the time, Leshchenko suggested that his motivation was partly to undermine Trump. “For me, it was important to show not only the corruption aspect, but that he is [a] pro-Russian candidate who can break the geopolitical balance in the world,” Leshchenko told the Financial Times about two weeks after his news conference. The newspaper noted that Trump’s candidacy had spurred “Kiev’s wider political leadership to do something they would never have attempted before: intervene, however indirectly, in a U.S. election,” and the story quoted Leshchenko asserting that the majority of Ukraine’s politicians are “on Hillary Clinton’s side.”
Well, well, well…but there’s more.
An operative who has worked extensively in Ukraine, including as an adviser to Poroshenko, said it was highly unlikely that either Leshchenko or the anti-corruption bureau would have pushed the issue without at least tacit approval from Poroshenko or his closest allies. 
“It was something that Poroshenko was probably aware of and could have stopped if he wanted to,” said the operative. 

And, almost immediately after Trump’s stunning victory over Clinton, questions began mounting about the investigations into the ledgers — and the ledgers themselves. 

An official with the anti-corruption bureau told a Ukrainian newspaper, “Mr. Manafort does not have a role in this case.”
And, while the anti-corruption bureau told Politico late last month that a “general investigation [is] still ongoing” of the ledger, it said Manafort is not a target of the investigation. “As he is not the Ukrainian citizen, [the anti-corruption bureau] by the law couldn’t investigate him personally,” the bureau said in a statement.
Note that the only thing that changed is Trump won the election, which apparently caused the Ukrainian government to backtrack on the entire thing after its sabotage failed to deliver the desire outcome.
Some Poroshenko critics have gone further, suggesting that the bureau is backing away from investigating because the ledgers might have been doctored or even forged.
And in an interview this week, Manafort, who re-emerged as an informal advisor to Trump after Election Day, suggested that the ledgers were inauthentic and called their publication “a politically motivated false attack on me. My role as a paid consultant was public. There was nothing off the books, but the way that this was presented tried to make it look shady.”
As shameless as all of this is, it doesn’t end there.
Poroshenko’s allies are scrambling to figure out how to build a relationship with Trump, who is known for harboring and prosecuting grudges for years. 

A delegation of Ukrainian parliamentarians allied with Poroshenko last month traveled to Washington partly to try to make inroads with the Trump transition team, but they were unable to secure a meeting, according to a Washington foreign policy operative familiar with the trip. And operatives in Washington and Kiev say that after the election, Poroshenko met in Kiev with top executives from the Washington lobbying firm BGR — including Ed Rogers and Lester Munson — about how to navigate the Trump regime.

Weeks later, BGR reported to the Department of Justice that the government of Ukraine would pay the firm $50,000 a month to “provide strategic public relations and government affairs counsel,” including “outreach to U.S. government officials, non-government organizations, members of the media and other individuals.”
The fact that foreign influence is purchased like this is simply disgusting, but I digress.
In fact, I’ve saved the best for last…
The Poroshenko regime’s standing with Trump is considered so dire that the president’s allies after the election actually reached out to make amends with — and even seek assistance from — Manafort, according to two operatives familiar with Ukraine’s efforts to make inroads with Trump.
After essentially claiming that Manafort was a hired gun for Putin to intervene in the internal affairs of Ukraine, the government is now reaching out to him? You don’t have to be Sherlock Holmes to see something’s not adding up here. Was the entire investigation a fraud to help Hillary Clinton win the election? If so, isn’t that election interference?

Nevertheless, I somehow I doubt we’ll see America’s three stooges, Graham, Rubio and McCain make a big stink over this one.

If you enjoyed this post, and want to contribute to genuine, independent media, consider visiting our Support Page.

In Liberty,
Michael Krieger



The big geopolitical players are making final moves, as the Presidency of Donald Trump and Western revolution loom. The Western military industrial complex made one of its final big moves by positioning a large tank army in Poland. This is ostensibly aimed at Russia, but is in fact a move by a Christian alliance, including Russia, that is aimed at China. Incoming Trump Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, for his part, threatened to attack Chinese bases in the South China Sea. (Hopefully, the upcoming positive changes on earth will make such ongoing, childishly convoluted, geopolitical one-upmanship unnecessary. – REC)

The background for these provocative remarks, CIA sources in Asia say, is that the Chinese have also sent 10 million people into Indonesia recently as part of a deal to build up the archipelago’s economic infrastructure, something that has raised alarm bells in the Pentagon. The Pentagon wants to build a new military base in the South China Sea to balance this Chinese move, the CIA sources say.

The Chinese responded by reminding the West, via the White Dragon Society, that in 1979, during the Sino-Vietnamese war, when Russia sent a mechanized army into China, Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping had it destroyed with a hydrogen bomb. The remains of this army can be seen on Google Earth and serve as a reminder why starting a war with China is not a good idea, Chinese intelligence officers say.

The sabre rattling is, in any case, just posturing in advance of heavy-duty negotiations on how to change the way we run this planet that will resume in earnest once the Trump presidency starts. The result is likely to be some sort of loose, democratic and meritocratic world government being formed because the alternative, nuclear holocaust, is unthinkable, sources involved in the negotiations say. (This is confirmation of the above contextual comments. – REC)

Make no mistake, the Trump Presidency is a second American revolution, and it will deeply affect the operations of the international secret rogue government.

Russian intelligence operatives contacted the WDS last week to seek reassurance the Trump presidency will be allowed to go ahead. They were told by the WDS that Trump was not going to be another assassinated leader like Kennedy because, unlike Kennedy, Trump has the backing of the US military. Here is what Pentagon Sources had to say about the matter: “A CIA plot to whack Trump is unlikely, since the military has read them the riot act. There are no Geneva conventions for domestic enemies of the state, and military justice is swift and lethal.”

However, Trump is not going to be allowed to do everything he wants, especially when it comes to Israel, the Pentagon sources say. “The UN Security Council may vote on January 17 to impose 1967 borders on Israel enforced by sanctions,” they say. Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu and Trump “may be forced out if they oppose the will of the international community, as peace and settlement of all conflicts is needed for a global currency reset,” the sources add.

Russian FSB sources, for their part, were able to confirm that when Donald Trump visited Russia in 2013, he was offered the chance to sleep in the same hotel room that Barack and Michelle Obama had slept in. “Everything is bugged and recorded in all the hotel rooms around the Red Square in Moscow,” says an FSB source who confirms video was recorded of Trump getting prostitutes to urinate on the bed the Obamas had slept in.

At the time he did not think he was going to become president, so he did not care,” said the source, who operates a security firm for VIPs in Russia and claims to have a copy of the recording. However, the Russians point out he did nothing illegal, and has never been blackmailed by them about this incident. Trump, for his part, has already announced his first overseas visit will be to Russia to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin. (This reinforces the fact that – contrary to US CIA-controlled corporate media reports, the only really relevant “golden showers” are going to be the upcoming global currency reset and reevaluation – NOT what Trump allegedly did or did not do in some Moscow hotel room.) – REC)

In any case, what is happening in the world is not about Donald Trump, he is just one aspect of a historical revolution. This revolution began in earnest with the British vote to exit the EU, took a further step with the election of Trump and is now headed for a Frexit or French EU exit, as French Presidential hopeful Marine Le Pen met with Trump last week in New York.

Even if Trump is killed, the revolution will continue because there has been a fundamental shift in the power structure of the West that has become unstoppable.

The unelected, corrupt, Khazarian mafia-owned EU is going to be replaced by a democratic European Union that includes the largest country in Europe, which is Russia, according to the Gnostic Illuminati. This grouping will be allied with North America, and will negotiate a 50/50 win-win new relationship with Asia when the dust finally settles, they say.

The change in world power can be seen by the diminished influence of the plutocrats gathered last week in Davos, Switzerland. The only major leader to attend this year was Chinese President Xi Jinping, and this may not have been a good move on his part, Pentagon sources say.

As Xi attends Davos, cabal operatives [German Prime Minister Angela] Merkel and Bibi [Netanyahu] bow out, as Trump refuses to attend to avoid meeting Xi, who may also be purged and replaced with a clone,” the Pentagon sources say. NSA and Gnostic illuminati sources both claim Xi reports to Evelyn de Rothschild and is not a genuine, independent Chinese leader. Since the Rothschilds are losing power, their proxies around the world are being replaced, the sources say.

(Here we go again with Fulford's sources playing “Supposed Satanic Minion of the Month” with him. Now they are saying, contrary to what they said several weeks ago, that Xi and Putin – then only Putin – were supposedly minions of Satan. Now we are back to Xi again being the Supposed Satanic Minion of the Month, with Putin remaining mercifully unmentioned as being a part of this month's Supposed Satanic circle! O):0)

This has already happened with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, CIA sources in Asia note. Asian Secret Society sources, for their part, insist Xi is independent, and reports to nobody but his colleagues in the Chinese government. (At least Fulford is now considering and citing other, more reliable sources from the Earth Alliance. – REC)

In any case, the real mess that needs cleaning up in not in China but in the US, where a major purge is continuing to unfold. The pedophile- related blackmail network in the US power structure continues to be dismantled in the so-called Pizzagate scandal. Also, the artificial drought and attempted grab of California farmland by Khazarian mobsters has been ended with benevolently geoengineered storms. (This is confirmed by now abundant news stories coming out in even the US corporate mainstream media about the flooding there, and by stories in foreign and independent media this past week that several of the major funders of the “Clinton Global Initiative” – including Germany, Norway and Saudi Arabia – have begun to pull their pay-to-play monies out of the Clinton Foundation. – REC)

There are also over 150 FBI agents in five cities, working in tandem with the New York Police Department, probing the Clinton foundation for money laundering and financing so-called Islamic terror organizations, Pentagon sources note. The Clintons, in response, have been singing like canaries about their former patrons, the Bush family, and their Saudi and German allies.

The Saudis, the Israeli and CIA factions behind the ISIL mercenary army, for their part, are making threats against Trump, trying to provoke war by attacking Syria and using nuclear blackmail in order to keep control of their share of Middle Eastern oil money. This is not going to work, because the entire planet has become disgusted with their criminal antics, and nobody is being fooled any more by their primitive propaganda.

In Japan, meanwhile, the slave government of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is acting like a deer frozen in the headlights as reality crashes towards them. The fraudulently elected Liberal Democratic Party government is still hoping that their bosses, Rothschild agent Michael Greenberg and Bush agent Richard Armitage, will somehow stay in power and protect them. They also thought Japan was going to be ruled by China, as a part of deal made by the Bushes and Clintons with China, Asian secret society sources say. This is not going to happen, since Japan will be allying itself with Korea and Russia in order to maintain a stable regional balance of power, Japanese right-wing sources say.

Furthermore, bribed stooges like Shinjiro Koizumi, the son of arch-traitor Junichiro Koizumi, have disgusted the Japanese underworld by saying, as Koizumi Jr. recently did, that they are resigned to Japanese population shrinking to half of its current number. You can be sure a purge of these traitors will take place in Japan once the clean-up of their bosses in Europe and the US is completed.

A purge is already in progress in South Korea, the other Khazarian slave state in Asia, with the impeachment of the President and a bribery probe into the family that controls Samsung, their biggest conglomerate.

Message to Crown Prince Naruhito: save your country before it is too late and control of Japan is handed over to the Kim Jong Un proxy. Contact the White Dragon representatives in Japan, if you do not know what to do and they will help. Time is running out.

In any case, the current logjam in world events will break big time once the Trump presidency starts on January 20th. Those who cling to the old structure will be flushed down the toilet of history along with it. “It is visibly falling apart, and even the people in the old corporate media are starting to report this,” one Illuminati source noted. Those who embrace the coming revolution and wish to save the planet will get a chance to help in the job of starting a new golden age.

What politicians have done to America


Roger Anghis
January 8, 2017

We have allowed politicians to do things to America that should have never be allowed. This is why Donald Trump won. He believes in America first where the majority of politicians in D.C. believe in globalism which demands wealth redistribution to less fortunate nations. These fools believe that the earth can only maintain a population of 500,000,000. I guess they don’t think God thought of this before He started this project. Just a thought on that - you could put the present entire world population in the State of Texas and have the population density of Paris, France. That fact alone blows their theory out of the water. 

But these people have adopted what is called a ‘sustainable development’. Watch for the usage of that word ‘sustainable’.  It will become a part of our thought process from here on out. One of their plans to control population is something they call ‘soft kill technology’. This is attained through medicine, vaccines and not addressing the root of a disease but only treating the results of the disease

The other is through food. Yes, I said food. What food could do this you may ask? Genetically Modified Organisms or GMO’s. Over 90% of our corn and soy grown in the United States are GMO. Potatos, wheat, tomatoes, apples and many other ‘foods’ are now GMO. They are genetically engineered with Roundup to be resistant to Roundup. The basic ingredient in this is what was called Agent Orange in Viet Nam. My brother died from exposure to this while he served as a Sea Bee in Nam. Many others were affected by it and still suffer to this day.

Bill Gates Foundation is involved in vaccines that are designed to cripple and kill. He was a seemingly nice guy in the first half of his life, an 'average American' who made his fortune by selling hardware and software worth of billions, becoming a worldwide icon and a living example of the American Dream

But, in the second half of his life, he teamed up with the world's "elite" in an attempt to reduce the world's population by billions... and he means business! He soon became one of the most infamous depopulation activists, lecturing on genocidal vaccines, conducting vaccination campaigns that crippled and killed countless people in the third world countries, designing GMO mosquitoes that could carry and inject deadly viruses, and he's constantly finding new methods of achieving his sick plans.

I am, of course, talking about Bill Gates, the man who recently pushed the population control agenda one step further: he announced the development of a remote-controlled contraceptive microchip, which can be implanted under the skin and last up to 16 years.

How does it work?  After the microchip is implanted, it will start releasing a daily dose of the controversial contraceptive levonorgestrel, which is a hormone used to prevent pregnancy.

According to Gate’s Foundation, a woman can choose when to deactivate (or reactivate) the chip using a wireless control, but considering the dark past of Bill Gates' involvement in depopulation, we would be crazy to trust them![1] 

Gates is very involved in the depopulation of the earth: “In a recent TED conference presentation, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to new vaccine efforts, speaks on the issue of CO2 emissions and its effects on climate change. He presents a formula for tracking CO2 emissions as follows: CO2 = P x S x E x C.

P = People
S = Services per person
E = Energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit

Then he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero, "probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero."

Following that, Bill Gates begins to describe how the first number -- P (for People) -- might be reduced. He says:

"The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."

They have employed electro-magnetic field (EMF), smart meters, even mobile phones. Smart meters have been pronounced unhealthy by many doctors some claiming that there is ‘no evidence whatsoever that smart meters are in any way safe for humans.’ “Dr. David Carpenter MD, a graduate of Harvard Medical School and a physician who has worked in the area of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and public health for over 18 years, has a few choice words for power companies that are forcing smart meters down the throats of their customers all over the United States.

Dr. Carpenter adamantly insists that there is no evidence whatsoever that smart meters are in any way safe for human beings. He goes on to say that there is, in fact, ample evidence that demonstrates “convincingly and consistently” that exposure to radio frequency radiation (RFR) at elevated levels for long periods of time increases the risk of cancer, damages the nervous system, and adversely affects the reproductive organs.

There is also the Codex Alimentarius Commission which is supposed to set standards concerning our food. They even have a nutritional labeling code but the United States refuses to force the labeling of GMO products

Many food producers do voluntarily but this last session of Congress a bill, HR 1599, called “The Dark Bill” which prevents mandatory GMO labeling was passed. I thought Congress was supposed to act in the best interest of the people. The FDA is supposed to see that all foods are safe and no study done by independent researchers have ever concluded that GMO’s are safe. All conclude they are bad for human health. Only studies done by the manufacturers of GMO’s have come to the conclusion that GMO’s are safe.
These are the only studies the government pays attention to. Think about this.  Monsanto, one of the largest producers of GMO seeds, only serves organic food in its cafeterias. “Food companies would not have to disclose whether their products include genetically modified ingredients under legislation passed by the House Thursday.

The House bill is backed by the food industry, which has fought mandatory labeling efforts in several states around the country. The legislation, which passed 275-150, would prevent states from requiring package labels to indicate the presence of genetically modified organisms, or GMOs.

So far, Vermont is the only state set to require the labels. That law will take effect in July 2017 if it survives a legal challenge from the food industry. Maine and Connecticut have also passed laws requiring the labeling, but those measures don’t take effect unless neighboring states follow suit.

The country’s largest food companies say genetically modified foods are safe and that labels would be misleading. They say a patchwork of laws around the country would be expensive for companies and confusing for consumers.

“The reality is, biotechnology has time and time again proved safe,” the bill’s sponsor, Kansas Republican Rep. Mike Pompeo, said on the House floor. “We should not raise prices on consumers based on the wishes of a handful of activists.  (So now, according to politicians, those who want HONEST reporting on food ingredients, including if they are GMO's - among other poisons whether RoundUP is contained in and/or sprayed on your foods or DNA of insects, etc. - and you are now an 'activist' because you want TRUTH so you can make a healthy selection on what you consume??)

Sunday, January 15, 2017

Eye Doctors are Robbing Us Blind

How  Eye  Doctors  are  Robbing  Us  Blind

Recently, there has been a lot of talk in libertarian and conservative circles about eminent domain abuse, civil asset forfeiture, and the freedom of association. However, one private property rights violation that affects over 41 million Americans per year has gone completely under the radar.

For years, optometrists and ophthalmologists have been holding back prescriptions — legally, the property of the patient — as a way to artificially boost their market share.

This is because eye doctors don’t only fit consumers for contact lenses, but they also sell the product in their offices. They often hold back consumers’ prescriptions so they can nab the sale for themselves, helping their favored brands — Johnson & Johnson, CooperVision, Alcon, and Bausch & Lomb, which control about 97 percent of the contact lens market — in the process.

Solving Problems That Don’t Exist

In truth, the 'government' shouldn’t even be mandating the use of doctor prescriptions. After all, most of Europe and Japan doesn’t require the use of a prescription. Even the American Optometry Association (AOA), the same trade association that lobbies for more government mandates and was once found guilty by 32 state attorneys generals of colluding with lens manufacturers to capture the contact lens market, admits that it is not necessary for patients to go to the eye doctor’s office every time a lens refill is needed.

Of course, gutting the prescription mandate is not an easy task. In 2004, Congress tried to fix this messy situation an easier way by passing the Contact Lens Rule. This rule clarified that the prescription is, indeed, the property of the patient and not the doctor. Because of this law, doctors are now mandated to give patients copies of their prescriptions. At the same time, they are also still allowed to strike down a given lens sale within one business day should they find a reasonable health or safety concern with the vendor.

The Contact Lens Rule made great strides in rectifying the problem at hand. It caused the price of contact lenses to fall to record lows. A study published by Contact Lens Spectrum showed that the number of contact lens wearers over the age of 18 grew by a whopping $5 billion from 2005 to 2015, all while the market valuation of the U.S contact lens industry grew by nearly $1 billion.

While this new law certainly helped the industry, the regulatory capture problem is still far from being fully solved. Many doctors, angered by the fact that the market share of mass merchandisers and retail chains grew by a combined 20 percent after the 2004 law’s passage, have been neglecting the law and holding back prescriptions in a desperate attempt to increase their market share to pre-2004 highs.

That’s why in April of 2016, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued 55 warning letters to prescribers and retailers who have been ignoring the Contact Lens Rule. Unfortunately, these warnings did little to smack eye doctors back into reality. 

To close the loophole once and for all, the Commission recently proposed a new rule to ensure that free market competition is fully restored to the contact lens industry.
To make sure that patients aren’t misled ever again, the new FTC rule will mandate that prescribers present the patient with an acknowledgement form to certify that each customer understands that they are “free to purchase contact lenses from [their] seller of choice.” The rule will also permit the seller to substitute contact lenses manufactured by the same company but sold under another label.

Rampant Cronyism

Although this FTC rule is clearly helpful in undoing a law that should never have existed, the American Optometric Association (AOA) claims that 'it will greatly increase the risk of eye infections'.  Of course, the AOA’s “concerns” are hogwash. As Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal once said, “The industry has hidden behind claims of health concerns requiring that individuals get their contact lenses from certain professionals. … But there is no scientific basis to that claim.”

It appears that the AOA’s lobbyists are forgetting that, under current law, eye doctors can still strike down third party sales if there is actually a valid health concern.  There really is nothing to worry about.

It is also worth noting that their concerns come in stark contrast to the empirical data in the medical industry, which shows that the purchasing location of contact lenses has very limited association with eye health risks.

The FTC found that the studies the AOA point to are misleading. “The Stapleton study identified internet/mail order purchases as a potential risk factor for microbial keratitis in a large sample from Australia,” said the Commission. “However, when the authors of the Stapleton study limit their sample to cases of moderate to severe keratitis, internet/mail order purchases are not found to be a risk factor.”

Instead of accepting these academic and medical studies, the AOA is now lobbying Congress to re-introduce and pass the Contact Lens Consumer Health Protection Act (CLCHPA), which will completely scrap the 2004 free market reform legislation and ensure that new FTC rules are not established.

This session, Congress needs to be smart and not allow crony capitalist eye doctors to blur the lines of consumer protection laws in ways that benefit established interests. Instead, it should work to open up the industry by closing the remaining loopholes that allow some doctors to profit from protectionist policies.